• Home
• Topics
  • Aid Effectiveness
  • Capital Flows/Financial Crises
  • Climate Change
  • Debt Relief
  • Economic Growth
  • Education
  • Finance

  • Food and Agriculture
  • Fragile States
  • Global Health Policy
  • Globalization
  • Governance/Democracy
  • Inequality
  • International Financial Institutions

  • Migration and Development
  • Population and Development
  • Poverty
  • Private Investment
  • Regions
  • Trade
   
• Initiatives
  • 2009 Commitment to Development Index
  • Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA)
  • Cash on Delivery (COD) Aid
  • Closing the Evaluation Gap
  • Combating Drug Resistance
  • Commitment to Development Award
  • Demographics and Development in the 21st Century

  • Forest Monitoring for Action (FORMA)
  • Girls Count: A Global Investment and Action Agenda
  • Global Health Policy Research Network
  • Globalization and Inequality
  • HIV/AIDS Monitor
  • Improving Migration Data
  • MCA Monitor

  • Millions Saved
  • Reforming Trade Preferences
  • Rethinking U.S. Foreign Assistance
  • Scott Family Liberia Fellows
  • The Future of the World Bank
  • U.S. Development Strategy in Pakistan
   
• Publications
• Blogs
• Experts
• Events
• For Educators
• Impact

Oct 18, 2007

On October 18th, 2007, Agence Française de Développement quotes Nancy Birdsall in an article about the controversy surrounding private company donations to IDA.

From the article:

"'It's hard to see why it is not a good idea from the point of view of the development community, the traditional donors, that some private companies would contribute to IDA,' said CGD president Nancy Birdsall."