Billions for War, Pennies for the Poor: Moving the President's FY2008 Budget from Hard Power to Smart Power

Publication Info

Publication Type

• Essays

Download

• Download (PDF, 109 KB)

Initiatives

• Commitment to Development Index 2006
• Engaging Fragile States
• MCA Monitor: Tracking the Millennium Challenge Account
• Modernizing U.S. Foreign Assistance

Research Topics

• Aid Effectiveness
• Governance/Democracy
• Poverty

CGD Expert

• Sheila Herrling

Opinions

• Can Foreign Aid Help Win the War on Terror?
• Think Again: U.S. Foreign Aid [Foreign Policy]
• How much does the U.S. help?
• President Bush’s Second Term and Development: Five Issues Worth Watching
• A Better Bush Legacy: How the president can change history without breaking the bank
• U.S. Foreign Assistance After September 11th: Testimony for the House Committee on International Relations
• Bush and Foreign Aid [Foreign Affairs]

Rights and Permissions

We welcome the use of CGD work-just let us know in advance! For contact information see our Rights & Permissions page. CGD rights and permissions are managed under the terms of the Creative Commons license below.

Samuel Bazzi, Sheila Herrling and Stewart Patrick

03/16/2007

Although the Bush administration has devoted substantial attention and resources to global development--including the biggest percentage increase in U.S. foreign assistance in decades--a careful look at the FY2008 budget shows that the United States continues to devote a relatively small share of its national wealth to alleviate poverty and promote self-sustaining growth in the developing world. This CGD essay examines the administration’s foreign assistance priorities as they are reflected in the budget. The authors find that, although the new budget framework of matching country characteristics with objectives represents a good first attempt at rationalizing U.S. foreign aid, at this point it is mostly just new and improved bookkeeping. They suggest five critical steps to reform U.S. development assistance:

• A comprehensive national strategy for development to ensure that increases in development aid take into account the long-term obstacles to growth and poverty reduction.
• A coherent approach to weak and failing states.
• A hard look at the top recipients of overall foreign aid and development aid to ensure the right aid, in the right amounts, is going to the right countries. Almost 50% of U.S. international assistance goes to just six countries that are allies in the global war on terror or the war on drugs.
• An integrated impact evaluation function built into the budgeting process from the beginning, to maximize the impact of U.S. development interventions.
• A rewriting of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and consideration of a Cabinet-level development agency.