CGD in the News

Sir, The Stern review on climate economics may well achieve a long-overdue shift in the burden of proof towards those who argue that it is uneconomic to cut the rising path of carbon emissions by anything more than trivial amounts ("Benefits of climate action outweigh costs", November 7 - subscription required). Despite its emphasis on new scientific evidence of greater risks, it does so primarily by adopting essentially the discounting method I proposed in my book The Economics of Global Warming.

CGD research fellow Michael Clemens was interviewed for this VOA article on the migration of African health care workers.

Senior fellow Steve Radelet was quoted in this article about the decision of the Global Fund's board not to select a new Executive Director during their recent talks in Guatemala City.

From the article:

Steven Radelet, a senior fellow at the Washington-based think tank Center for Global Development, which recently produced a report on new challenges facing the fund, said the failure to elect a new leader "is not good for the organization," but added that "trying to force through one candidate wouldn't be good, either." "I think it's a good process in that they clearly give voice to developing countries in a much stronger way" than the World Bank or International Monetary Fund, he said.

Read CGD's latest report Challenges and Opportunities for the New Executive Director of the Global Fund: Seven Essential Tasks

Research fellow David Roodman's latest publication, Microfinance as Business (co-authored with Uzma Qureshi), is discussed in this posting on Salon.com by Andrew Leonard. The article focuses on the pros and cons of micro-finance for development.

From the article:

For a couple of weeks now, I've been puzzling about poor women and cows in Bangladesh.

Let me explain.

On the same day that Muhammad Yunus, founder of the Grameen Bank and chief apostle of the church of microcredit, received the Nobel Peace Prize, the Center For Global Development (CGD), a Washington-based nonprofit, published a study by David Roodman and Uzma Qureshi with the title "Microfinance as Business."

Microfinance is generally taken to mean the provision of small loans -- microcredit -- and other financial services to very poor people, and Yunus is widely acclaimed as the man who pioneered its effective application. So CGD's timing was excellent. But the thrust of the study was contrarian to the point of outright dissidence. Though the Nobel Prize committee, as CGD noted in its own interview with Roodman published three days later, "praised Yunus and Grameen for 'their efforts to create economic and social development from below,'" Roodman says that for him "the jury is still out" over whether microfinance contributes to economic development among the poor. In their paper, Roodman and Qureshi argued that there isn't yet definitive evidence that microfinance actually lifts people out of poverty.

"Unfortunately, rigorously derived evidence that microcredit helps people in this way is surprisingly thin."

Surprising is the right word, because microfinance has never been hotter. 2005 was dubbed "The Year of Microcredit" by the United Nations. Philanthropists, aid donors, and profit-seeking capitalists of every stripe are all pouring hundreds of milllions of dollars into microfinance schemes across the globe. (An absorbing article in last week's New Yorker delves deeply into the differing motivations, and consequent friction between, the new players in microfinance, who include Microsoft's Bill "philanthropist" Gates and eBay founder Pierre "profit-seeking" Omidyar.) Heartwarming success stories of people living in extreme poverty -- mostly women -- who have clawed their way out of the most abject circumstances with the help of miniscule loans, abound...