With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
In today's Financial Times, former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan makes a strong case for collective action on the situation in Zimbabwe. Mr Annan argues that "if the government, which many claim to be the author of violence, cannot ensure a fair vote, Africa must hold it accountable. The victor of an unfair vote must be under no illusions: he will neither have the legitimacy to govern, nor receive the support of the international community."
This sentiment is widely shared but Mr Annan does not stop here. Citing the just-released report of the Africa Progress Panel, which he also chairs, he argues that Africa's governance problems are far from insurmountable -- many countries are taking steps to become healthy, sustainable democracies. Mr Annan proposes a "compact of reconciliation," in which all political parties must come together now on governance arrangements and the process of transition, no matter who the winner of the election will be. For Zimbabwe to survive the election, Mr Annan says that it is just as important for the international community to support this effort as it is to insist on an election free of intimidation and violence.
Mr Annan's approach is unusual -- he recognizes Mr. Mugabe's role in Zimbabwe's independence movement (rarely mentioned in the British press) while at the same time condemning Mr Mugabe's military operations to win the next election. Mr Annan succeeded in brokering a power-sharing arrangement in Kenya, when all other efforts failed. His approach to the situation in Zimbabwe is worthy of careful consideration.
CGD blog posts reflect the views of the authors, drawing on prior research and experience in their areas of expertise. CGD is a nonpartisan, independent organization and does not take institutional positions.
Despite improvements in censuses and household surveys, the building blocks of national statistical systems in sub-Saharan Africa remain weak. Measurement of fundamentals such as births and deaths, growth and poverty, taxes and trade, land and the environment, and sickness, schooling, and safety is shaky at best. The Data for African Development Working Group’s recommendations for reaping the benefits of a data revolution in Africa fall into three categories: (1) fund more and fund differently, (2) build institutions that can produce accurate, unbiased data, and (3) prioritize the core attributes of data building blocks.