With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
Moving support to developing countries from billions to trillions cannot be done through official grants and lending alone. The bulk of the additional money must come from the private sector. While relatively high yields on projects in developing countries should attract international capital flows, the trends are not positive, and amounts are not at the magnitude needed. MDBs and DFIs are the key intermediaries in accelerating the flow of these funds as they offer to the private sector substantial expertise in finding, framing, financing and evaluating projects in developing countries.
CGD is working with both the private sector financiers and MDB/DFI officials to gather information, formal and informal, to 1) uncover the blockages to increased international capital flows for development; 2) propose concrete changes to MDB/DFI policies and procedures that could facilitate these flows; and 3) open new pathways for the public and private sectors to interact so that private investment in developing countries accelerates.
A key element of the scaling up is how DFIs will use blended finance—traditional market-term financing combined with concessional finance—to speed up investment in riskier projects with more development impact. In this area, the primary questions are:
There are arguments for and against “spending through the tax system.” On one hand tax incentives are relatively easy to implement; they don’t require an outlay of cash and they make use of information that revenue agencies already collect. But on the other, loading the tax system with too many policy objectives conflicts with the drive for a coherent, simple, transparent tax system. Despite decades of advice from international organisations to curtail tax incentives, they remain a popular tool for governments.
Businesses have unique opportunities to help refugees and improve their bottom line at the same time, says CGD senior policy fellow Cindy Huang. All they need is the right policy framework. Get the highlights from Huang’s latest report, Global Business and Refugee Crises, a collaboration with the Tent Foundation.
Each of the G20 summits of the past seven years has suffered in comparison with the London and Pittsburgh Summits of 2009, when the imperative of crisis response motivated leaders, finance ministers, and central bankers to coordinate effectively with each other. Subsequent summits have lacked the same sense of urgency and have failed to deliver any kind of agenda that can be pinpointed as clearly as “saving the global economy.” This week’s summit in Hamburg, Germany promises more of the same, with the real possibility that the G20’s stock could fall even further at the hands of a non-cooperative US delegation.
The World Bank’s soft lending arm for poorer countries, IDA, is busy rolling out a new $2.5 billion Private Sector Window. (See last year’s outline proposal for reference.) Bigger private sectors in IDA countries would be hugely welcome, so there is much to like in the broad thrust of the proposal, as suggested by Nancy Lee. But I’m left a little baffled by the details, and would love some reactions as to what I’m missing.
The budget just released zeroes out the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the nation’s development finance institution. In an era where many government agencies are under threat, it may not be surprising that OPIC would come under fire. Yet, none of the arguments often used to justify killing off OPIC are logical. Here’s why.