US Researchers Aim to Shed Light on Africa Aid (China Daily)
China Daily covers the launch of the China in Africa project, featuring research from The Center for Global Development and AidData.
China's funding of development assistance in Africa has for years concerned stakeholders there as well as Western aid donors because the Chinese government doesn't disclose information about its activities on the continent.
As aid from China to African countries grows, along with the separate category of bilateral trade, others have been left to estimate the level and nature of Chinese assistance. Critics have charged that China's aid programs in Africa are mainly about exploiting natural resources to feed its own economy and that a Chinese willingness to do business with corrupt African governments undercuts policies touted by Western donors such as project governance and environmental sustainability.
China disputes such claims, and there is far from a consensus among aid experts that the dire accusations are true. But Beijing's preference for secrecy in financing and administering aid projects in developing countries fuels uncertainty. In an official declaration at the end of a global aid donors' meeting in 2011, China said "the principle of transparency should apply to North-South cooperation but that it should not be seen as a standard for South-South cooperation". (The latter term refers to aid from one developing country to another.)
A new database built by researchers in the United States aims to bring transparency to Chinese aid in Africa, by using media reports and crowd-sourced information.
Now online at aiddatachina.org, the database is an attempt by a partnership involving the College of William and Mary, Brigham Young University and the group Development Gateway to inform the debate over China-to-Africa aid without rendering a judgment therein.
While emphasizing that he and his research colleagues take no position on what's motivating Chinese aid, Parks also said the database isn't meant to provide a definitive, "top line" assessment of what the numbers add up to.
For example, he said, media coverage since the database and an accompanying Center for Global Development report went public last week has focused on a finding that China allocated $75 billion on 1,673 development projects in 50 African countries from 2000 to 2011 - about the same value as US-funded projects to Africa during those years, as measured by international standards of official development assistance (ODA) and other official flows (OOF).
Although those figures are accurate, Parks pointed out that much of the media coverage has described all of these Chinese projects as "aid", but he and his co-authors don't make this claim in their report. They divide Chinese government-supported projects into categories they devised, including "ODA-like," "OOF-like" and "Official Vague". The third of these is meant to account for the many Chinese development-finance initiatives that could fall under either of the other two categories but for which insufficient data exist to make a determination.