With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
Don’t Count on the Truce Holding in Trump’s Trade War With China (World Politics Review)
December 4, 2018
By Kimberly Ann Elliott
From the article:
As widely expected, U.S. President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping declared a truce in their trade war over dinner in Buenos Aires this past weekend. According to the White House statement after the meeting, Xi committed to increase imports of American agricultural and energy products to reduce the bilateral trade deficit and to immediately begin negotiations over China’s unfair trade policies. In exchange, Trump agreed that he would not increase tariffs from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion in Chinese exports as scheduled on Jan. 1, but that he could do so later if there is no broader agreement within 90 days. The Chinese statement was not so specific, saying only that it would import more from the U.S. and that the two countries would “work together to reach a consensus on trade issues,” with no mention of a deadline. Vagueness plus a tight U.S. deadline virtually guarantee that this is only a temporary truce.
This should all sound very familiar. Indeed, I’m tempted to say that it is déjà vu all over again, again. On three prior occasions, Trump administration officials announced similar deals to increase American exports and address trade barriers in China. In the most recent instance, at the end of May, chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow announced that the administration had reached a deal that would avoid the imposition of tariffs over China’s unfair trade practices, following an investigation under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act. He claimed that Chinese negotiators had agreed to reduce the trade deficit by at least $200 billion, and “just as important, they have to lower their tariff rates, they have to lower their non-tariff barriers. We have to have a verifiable process whereby the technology transfers and the theft of intellectual property stops.”