With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
Tim Ogden and I want a new research agenda for migration and remittances.
Development policymakers have gotten excited about remittances, the cash that migrants send to developing countries. In large part this is because remittances are huge—about triple the size of foreign aid flows. That’s a big opportunity for development.
Co-Director of Migration, Displacement, and Humanitarian Policy and Senior Fellow
But much of the research on remittances focuses on why they are primarily spent on consumption, and how governments and NGOs can get people to invest remittances. Here’s my skepticism about that agenda, in one minute:
Researchers tend to study remittances as if they were windfall income, like aid or oil revenue, that arrives like manna from heaven. This leads researchers toward the kind of questions you might ask about windfall income: Are remittances spent on ‘good’ things like investment and education? Do families and countries become ‘dependent’ on remittances?
But remittances are not a windfall like lottery winnings. For many low-income families, they are a return on investment. Migration is one of many financial tools they juggle to smooth income and consumption. Migration often involves a family member moving to access a different labor market, and that household is investing in an asset, bearing up-front costs for uncertain future benefits. Remittances therefore are part of the family’s return on investment similar to the return on investment for investing in education of a family member. An agenda that misses these dynamics misses what’s most important in the causes and effects of remittances.
A better theory leads to better questions about the role they play in household financial management, and ultimately to better understanding of how remittances and payments systems shape development.
Tim and I identify 12 of those ‘better questions’ in our full paper, ‘Migration as a strategy for household finance’. We map out the newest literature and give pointers to some of the innovative researchers who are starting to steer research toward more fruitful questions about remittances. It’s a fresh and exciting area.