With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
The Tea Party movement in the United States had a big impact on this year’s mid-term election. The energy it channeled can be seen as a pendulum shift from the progressive winds that were blowing in 2008. So what comes next?
Director of Migration, Displacement, and Humanitarian Policy and Senior Fellow
Greg Mankiw (Harvard Economics Professor) posted this dramatic rallying cry on his blog this week. The sign, hoisted at a pre-election “Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear,” presages what I believe we are going to see emerge as the major force for change in the United States in 2012 – a campaign for evidence-based policy! A large slice of the U.S. electorate is growing weary of fact-free policy and pseudo-science. I predict we will see house parties organized in the next few months to read and discuss back issues of CGD’s Evaluation Gap Newsletter. It won’t be long after that before they’ll be demanding that President Obama follows through on his stated commitment to make foreign aid “accountable” and cite Michael Clemens’ blog calling for programs like the Millennium Villages Project to do the research needed to see if they really represent a sustainable route out of poverty. The politicians that will ride this wave in 2012 are the ones who will be able to cite the meta-analyses that informed their platforms.
I think it is fitting that Mankiw posted this photograph. After all, the preface to his textbook, Principles of Economics, makes a case for why students should study economics. “As a voter, you help choose the policies that guide the allocation of society’s resources,” he writes. I think we even have evidence to support that claim.
[Thanks to Sarah Jane Staats who brought the photograph to my attention]
CGD blog posts reflect theviews of the authors drawing on prior research and experience in their areas of expertise. CGD does not take institutional positions.
Early this month, CGD co-hosted a conference with the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), highlighting progress, challenges, and lessons learned from the first phase of the Salud Mesoamerica Initiative (SMI), a seven-year-old results-based funding (RBF) partnership between donors and national governments in health. Uniquely, the event brought together country governments, external funders, intermediaries, and evaluators—from different stages of the program—to discuss motivations, results, issues, and lessons learned.
What impact does corruption have on development, and what’s the best way to stamp it out? In a new book called Results, Not Receipts, CGD senior fellow Charles Kenny offers a way to strengthen the case for aid and reduce corruption at the same time: focus on outcomes, rather than inputs.
When you read what economists have to say about development, it is easy to be disheartened about the prospects for poor countries. One big reason is that slow changing institutional factors are seen as key to development prospects. I’ve just published a CGD book that’s a little more optimistic: Results Not Receipts: Counting the Right Things in Aid and Corruption.
Last Thursday President Trump announced he’d withdraw the United States from the Paris climate agreement—a shameful act of self-harm. Condemnation has been swift, widespread, and gratifying. But if dangerous climate change is to be prevented then dissenting statements must be backed up with strong climate policies. Fortunately some countries, states, cities, and businesses are already matching words with deeds on climate. Here’s a rundown.