With rigorous economic research and practical policy solutions, we focus on the issues and institutions that are critical to global development. Explore our core themes and topics to learn more about our work.
In timely and incisive analysis, our experts parse the latest development news and devise practical solutions to new and emerging challenges. Our events convene the top thinkers and doers in global development.
Working Group on the Future of Global Health Procurement
Many low-and lower-middle-income countries currently procure a large portion of their health commodities—drugs, devices, diagnostics, and vector control tools—through centralized, donor-managed procurement mechanisms, and often at subsidized prices or as donations. Over the next several decades, however, the landscape of global health procurement will change dramatically as countries grow richer and lose aid eligibility; disease burdens shift; and technological breakthroughs change the portfolio of commodity needs. To consider how the global health community can ensure the medium- to long-term relevance, efficiency, quality, affordability, and security of global health procurement, the Center for Global Development (CGD) launched the Working Group on the Future of Global Health Procurement in July 2017. A final report is expected in spring 2019. Throughout this process, CGD will engage key global health stakeholders—country representatives, procurement agents, funders, and industry partners—to reflect the range of views on these issues and encourage the adoption of proposed recommendations.
In recent decades, the world has made great strides toward improving global access to lifesaving health commodities, including medicines, diagnostics, medical devices, and vector control tools.* This increase in access has in large part resulted from the investments of international health partnerships such as UNICEF, UNFPA, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and bilateral aid programs such as PEPFAR, DFID, and USAID. To deliver these lifesaving global health commodities to where they are needed most, these funders have also set up centralized procurement mechanisms to purchase drugs, diagnostics, devices, and vector control tools from manufacturers, and to subsequently make them available to countries at subsidized prices or as donations.
Over the next decade, however, most low-income countries will become middle-income countries that are ineligible for aid under current rules, spend more domestic public monies on health, and self-procure most needed health commodities. At the same time, demographic and epidemiological changes will affect the size and composition of demand for health care and related products; infectious diseases will diminish in importance while non-communicable diseases increase. Other factors—such as growing drug resistance, the pace of economic growth and its impact on public spending, the trend towards increasing decentralization of procurement and service delivery, and the continual development of new technologies in the context of rising expectations for more comprehensive health benefits—will also put new pressures on global health procurement. In this context, policymakers should be prepared to take preemptive action to ensure the medium- to long-term relevance, efficiency, quality, affordability, and security of global health procurement. This Working Group considers how global health procurement mechanisms can adapt to this changing landscape.
Working group meetings were held on July 25, 2017 in Washington, DC; February 6-7, 2018 near Geneva, Switzerland; July 19-20, 2018 in London, England; and November 29, 2018 in Washington, DC. A supplementary technical workshop was hosted in April 2018 in Toulouse, France. The final report is expected in the first half of 2019.
*Note: This working group does not consider vaccines.
Michael Anderson, CDC Group Amie Batson, PATH Francisco Blanco, World Health Organization Christa Cepuch, MSF Access Campaign Kalipso Chalkidou, Center for Global Development Clinton De Souza, Imperial Logistics John Crowley, USAID, Supply Chain for Health Division Francesco Decarolis, Boston University and Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Todd Dickens, PATH James Droop, DFID Rebecca Forman, Center for Global Development Akthem Fourati, UNICEF Amanda Glassman, Center for Global Development Eduardo González-Pier, Mexican Institute of Social Security and Ministry of Health, Mexico Lisa Hare, USAID, Malaria Division Supply Chain Branch Jay Heavner, USAID Global Health Supply Chain – Procurement and Supply Management Project Beverly Lorraine Ho, Department of Health, Philippines Christine Jackson, Crown Agents Sneha Kanneganti, World Bank Navjot Khosa, Kerala Medical Service Corporation Ltd., India Biljana Kozlovic, Consultant and formerly National Health Insurance Fund, Serbia Wesley Kreft, Partnership for Supply Chain Management (PFSCM) Neel Lakhani, Clinton Health Access Initiative Beverly Lorraine Ho, Department of Health, Philippines Janeen Madan Keller, Center for Global Development Melissa Malhame, GAVI Alliance Susan Nazzaro, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Cassandra Nemzoff, Center for Global Development Roxanne Oroxom, Center for Global Development Ed Rose, NHS England Daniel Rosen, AfRx Consulting Group Rajeev Sadanandan, Government of Kerala William Savedoff, Center for Global Development Eugene Schneller, Arizona State University Andreas Seiter, World Bank Rachel Silverman, Center for Global Development Paul Stannard, Population Services International Netnapis Suchonwanich, National Health Security Office, Thailand Mariatou Tala Jallow, Global Fund Greg Vistnes, William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan Brenda Waning, Global Drug Facility Barnaby Wiles, World Bank Tommy Wilkinson, PRICELESS SA Hongwei Yang, National Health and Development Centre, China Philipp Kalpaxis, UNICEF Alan Martin, Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS)
In recent years, many global health institutions have adopted eligibility and transition frameworks for the countries they support, generating questions about how these frameworks apply in practice—and whether global health progress will be put at risk through premature or poorly planned transition processes.
Today, politicians are under growing pressure to squeeze more out of every dollar and guarantee greater access to better, more affordable healthcare for their citizens. In such a resource-constrained environment, wasting trillions of dollars on health every year is not viable. This note provides an overview of some of the approaches and policy options that the National Health Service in England has been using to maximise value for money.