Recommended
The IFC has the potential to be a macroeconomically significant player in the world’s poorest countries that most need a more vibrant private sector. Sadly, however, it provides very little finance to firms in those countries. The IDA Private Sector Window was designed to help that problem by subsidizing both IFC and MIGA operations in IDA and fragile states. But it is not delivering in terms of IFC own-account investing or development impact. MIGA is claiming significant leverage by using PSW funds to guarantee activities with considerable private investment, but these investments would occur without MIGA engagement. The IFC is frequently using PSW funds to support deals that might well not exist without public support, but take such a considerable amount of that finance that leverage and demonstration effects are both low. Neither organization is finding the sweet spot in the middle, likely because so few investable deals are available that hit such a sweet spot. It is time for a new approach: supporting country industrial development strategies with governments rather than firms as the primary client.
Topics
CITATION
Kenny, Charles. 2026. IFC and IDA Countries: Past Time for a New Approach. Center for Global Development.DISCLAIMER & PERMISSIONS
CGD's publications reflect the views of the authors, drawing on prior research and experience in their areas of expertise. CGD is a nonpartisan, independent organization and does not take institutional positions. You may use and disseminate CGD's publications under these conditions.
Thumbnail image by: IMF Photo/Flickr